movie critiques
Alexander David Bligh (panda)
CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? Yes.
-WHAT IS IT? A movie to inform us about the amount of violence in the media.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? Yes I do.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? Yes and no, the text slides weren’t long enough.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Yes.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yes, except for the time.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? Not really, but i don’t really entertain myself with violent media.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? Alex is original.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE – I don’t think so.
SHOCKING – yes to a certain extent.
PERSUASIVE – to a certain extent.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? His examples.
belynlynlyn said,
August 25, 2009 at 5:02 am
Andrew van Donselaar
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yes but not convincing.
-WHAT IS IT? A movie informing us on andrew’s opinion about violence in media.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? I don’t agree with him.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? No.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? no.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? no, the colour and length could have been thought through.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? no.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE – no.
SHOCKING – no.
PERSUASIVE – no.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? the fact that andrew isn’t afraid to tell people his opinion.
belynlynlyn said,
August 25, 2009 at 5:10 am
David Cash
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yeah.
-WHAT IS IT? a short movie about the violence in our media and how David thinks it’s alright but only if it doesn’t affect you.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? to a certain extent.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? yes.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? yes.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? yes a little bit.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE –no.
SHOCKING – yes.
PERSUASIVE – yes.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? the music.
belynlynlyn said,
August 25, 2009 at 11:57 pm
Erin Gray.
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yes.
-WHAT IS IT? a movie about the effect lust can have on humans.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yep.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? yes.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? yes.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? yes especially the part about the small child being someones daughter.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE –no.
SHOCKING – yes.
PERSUASIVE – yes.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? the scene with the fact about the shocking level of rapists.
belynlynlyn said,
August 27, 2009 at 2:33 am
joe lund
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? not really.
-WHAT IS IT? a short movie about the increasing rate of violence and crime.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? i agree with the increasing rate but it’s not very informative.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? not really.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? yes except for the pictures of the internet.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? no.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE –no.
SHOCKING – yes.
PERSUASIVE – yes.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? music.
belynlynlyn said,
August 27, 2009 at 2:38 am
kyle young.
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yes and no.
-WHAT IS IT? a short movie about the vioence in grand theft auto.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? i think some violence is ok, but it is very graphical
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? yes.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? yes.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? no.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE –no.
SHOCKING – yes.
PERSUASIVE – yes.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? pictures.
belynlynlyn said,
August 27, 2009 at 2:42 am
lachlan parkinson.
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yes.
-WHAT IS IT? a short movie informing us that there is a difference between real and fake violence and the affects.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? yes.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? yes.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? yes.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE –no.
SHOCKING – yes.
PERSUASIVE – yes.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? the contrast between fake and real violence.
belynlynlyn said,
August 27, 2009 at 2:48 am
Laura Eastley.
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yes.
-WHAT IS IT? an ad that is supportive for those with a lustful mind.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? yes.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? yes.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? yes.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE –no.
SHOCKING – yes.
PERSUASIVE – yes.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? the whole thing, laura did a fantastic of it.
belynlynlyn said,
August 27, 2009 at 2:56 am
Morgan Tannock
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yes.
-WHAT IS IT? an emotional movie that informs the audience about the affect lust can have on you.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? yes.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? yes.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? yes.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE –no.
SHOCKING – yes.
PERSUASIVE – yes.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? the emotion the music made.
belynlynlyn said,
August 27, 2009 at 3:03 am
nicholas rayner
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yes.
-WHAT IS IT? a short movie that informs the audience that there is increasing rates of violence in our everyday media.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? yes.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? yes.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? a little bit, mainly the war photos.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE –no.
SHOCKING – yes.
PERSUASIVE – yes.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? the quality of the photos.
belynlynlyn said,
August 27, 2009 at 3:10 am
Quentin douglas mitchell.
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yes.
-WHAT IS IT? a short movie that informs the audience that there is violence in schools, against women and children and in video games.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? yes.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? yes.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? no.
– WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE –no.
SHOCKING – yes.
PERSUASIVE – yes.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? the cartoons.